Insights · Winning with Patents

Patent Strategy for Innovators, in Plain English

Short videos on the patent decisions you actually face as a founder or innovation leader, and how to make them create value.

Latest Videos

🎯 Can you actually design a patent application to be GRANTED — on time, on budget, and broad enough to protect what makes you money? You can. But first you have to reject the two most maddening words in my profession: "it depends." 😤
Ask a patent attorney a straight question and you'll usually hear "well… it depends." But whether your innovation gets strong patent protection doesn't have to depend. Done right — strategically — you can formulate applications with a high likelihood of being granted. In this episode I show you exactly how. 🧭
I'm Jackie Hutter, and after 30+ years as a patent strategist, this is the framework I use with clients to design applications for allowance. ⚖️
🔑 The 4 steps you'll learn:

1️⃣ Start with a validated customer — and capture the FULL scope of value, not just your first sale 💰

2️⃣ Define your invention by difference — my "Sesame Street" approach to the prior art 🧠

3️⃣ Give the examiner a roadmap to YES — non-limiting backup claims that skip the expensive fight 🛣️

4️⃣ Tell a story — examiners are people, and the business (not just the lawyer) owns that story 📖
💡 Plus: why long claims aren't always narrow claims, a real startup example (measuring methane on a farm 🐄), and how AI + expert prompting is putting sophisticated patent strategy within reach of modestly resourced companies. 🤖
🚦 Proper planning prevents poor patent performance. Your patent doesn't have to depend — when it's done right, success can be designed. ✅
⏱️ Chapters:

00:00 The "it depends" problem

01:21 A patent that issues is no accident

03:59 Step 1 — Start with the customer

07:04 Innovation vs. invention

09:39 Step 2 — Define by difference

13:26 The non-limiting limitation

15:52 Step 3 — A roadmap for the examiner

17:56 Step 4 — Tell a story

21:48 What AI changes

23:53 Recap + the one question to ask your patent team
📣 If this helped, subscribe for founder-focused patent strategy — and share it with someone about to spend real money on a patent. They'll thank you. 🙏

💬 Got a patent question? Connect with me on LinkedIn — I answer fastest there: 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackiehutter/

🔗 More at thehuttergroup.com
⚠️ For educational purposes only — not legal advice.
#Patents #PatentStrategy #IPStrategy #AIPatent #IntellectualProperty #PatentLaw #IP #IPLaw #USPTO #Innovation #StartupFounders #Entrepreneurship #Inventor #PatentPortfolio #WinningWithPatents

🎯 Can you actually design a patent application to be GRANTED — on time, on budget, and broad enough to protect what makes you money? You can. But first you have to reject the two most maddening words in my profession: "it depends." 😤
Ask a patent attorney a straight question and you'll usually hear "well… it depends." But whether your innovation gets strong patent protection doesn't have to depend. Done right — strategically — you can formulate applications with a high likelihood of being granted. In this episode I show you exactly how. 🧭
I'm Jackie Hutter, and after 30+ years as a patent strategist, this is the framework I use with clients to design applications for allowance. ⚖️
🔑 The 4 steps you'll learn:

1️⃣ Start with a validated customer — and capture the FULL scope of value, not just your first sale 💰

2️⃣ Define your invention by difference — my "Sesame Street" approach to the prior art 🧠

3️⃣ Give the examiner a roadmap to YES — non-limiting backup claims that skip the expensive fight 🛣️

4️⃣ Tell a story — examiners are people, and the business (not just the lawyer) owns that story 📖
💡 Plus: why long claims aren't always narrow claims, a real startup example (measuring methane on a farm 🐄), and how AI + expert prompting is putting sophisticated patent strategy within reach of modestly resourced companies. 🤖
🚦 Proper planning prevents poor patent performance. Your patent doesn't have to depend — when it's done right, success can be designed. ✅
⏱️ Chapters:

00:00 The "it depends" problem

01:21 A patent that issues is no accident

03:59 Step 1 — Start with the customer

07:04 Innovation vs. invention

09:39 Step 2 — Define by difference

13:26 The non-limiting limitation

15:52 Step 3 — A roadmap for the examiner

17:56 Step 4 — Tell a story

21:48 What AI changes

23:53 Recap + the one question to ask your patent team
📣 If this helped, subscribe for founder-focused patent strategy — and share it with someone about to spend real money on a patent. They'll thank you. 🙏

💬 Got a patent question? Connect with me on LinkedIn — I answer fastest there: 👉 https://www.linkedin.com/in/jackiehutter/

🔗 More at thehuttergroup.com
⚠️ For educational purposes only — not legal advice.
#Patents #PatentStrategy #IPStrategy #AIPatent #IntellectualProperty #PatentLaw #IP #IPLaw #USPTO #Innovation #StartupFounders #Entrepreneurship #Inventor #PatentPortfolio #WinningWithPatents

0 0

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLjQ3ZFBvUmlha0tR

Designing Patent Applications for Allowance (4 Steps)

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups July 8, 2026 3:45 pm

‼️As a patent strategist who works exclusively with startup companies, I don’t care what my startup clients invented. Full stop.

🤦‍♀️And if you’re a startup founder, this probably runs directly against the question your patent lawyer usually asks you from the get go:

🫵“What did you invent?”

🤔It sounds logical if only because patents are supposed to protect "inventions."

🎢It’s also where most startup patent strategies inadvertently go off track.

🧑‍🦯‍➡️Because the "what did you invent?" inquiry assumes something most startups don’t actually have yet: clarity on what will drive value in the business.

⛔And here’s the part that founders likely don't realize--your patent attorney may not know the difference between what a startup needs… and what an established company needs.

🙂‍↔️They’re not doing anything wrong. They’re doing what they’ve been trained to do. But that training is largely built around companies that already know

☑️what customers will buy
☑️where revenue comes from
🎯what needs to be protected to cover the customers and revenue

🔀Startups are in a completely different position.

🔭They're still figuring out how to position their tech or products so that customers will buy from them at scale. And, if they haven't yet pivoted, they will--likely multiple times.

😭Which means if startup founder default to the same patenting approach used for established companies, they can end up protecting what they’ve already built in the past…instead of what will drive scalable revenue streams in the future.

🧐I see this play out all the time.

🔬The issue isn’t patent quality. It’s strategic focus.

🥂And this gap typically doesn’t show up until it may be too late: after the startup has customer validation and growing revenue. That is, when the business evolves into a success.

😞Unfortunately, this success may be short-lived if the startup's patent strategy was not solidly constructed.

👂Hear this: If you’re a startup founder building in an environment where your product, your customer, and even your business model may change, your patent strategy has to reflect that reality.

🛑Otherwise, you may end up very well protected… but for the wrong product. Importantly, a broad patent that covers the wrong product is worthless to the startup because it protects something that no one likely wants to buy.

📽️In this new video in my Winning with Patents Youtube channel, I show startup founders how to shift how they think about patent strategy. Give it a watch: https://lnkd.in/dh88XMAu

#startups #patents #ipstrategy #patentstrategy #founders #innovation #winningwithpatents

#Startups #PatentStrategy #IntellectualProperty #Founders #StartupAdvice #VentureCapital #Innovation #TechStartups #ProductMarketFit #Entrepreneurship #IPStrategy #Patents #BusinessStrategy  #AIStartups #meddevice

‼️As a patent strategist who works exclusively with startup companies, I don’t care what my startup clients invented. Full stop.

🤦‍♀️And if you’re a startup founder, this probably runs directly against the question your patent lawyer usually asks you from the get go:

🫵“What did you invent?”

🤔It sounds logical if only because patents are supposed to protect "inventions."

🎢It’s also where most startup patent strategies inadvertently go off track.

🧑‍🦯‍➡️Because the "what did you invent?" inquiry assumes something most startups don’t actually have yet: clarity on what will drive value in the business.

⛔And here’s the part that founders likely don't realize--your patent attorney may not know the difference between what a startup needs… and what an established company needs.

🙂‍↔️They’re not doing anything wrong. They’re doing what they’ve been trained to do. But that training is largely built around companies that already know

☑️what customers will buy
☑️where revenue comes from
🎯what needs to be protected to cover the customers and revenue

🔀Startups are in a completely different position.

🔭They're still figuring out how to position their tech or products so that customers will buy from them at scale. And, if they haven't yet pivoted, they will--likely multiple times.

😭Which means if startup founder default to the same patenting approach used for established companies, they can end up protecting what they’ve already built in the past…instead of what will drive scalable revenue streams in the future.

🧐I see this play out all the time.

🔬The issue isn’t patent quality. It’s strategic focus.

🥂And this gap typically doesn’t show up until it may be too late: after the startup has customer validation and growing revenue. That is, when the business evolves into a success.

😞Unfortunately, this success may be short-lived if the startup's patent strategy was not solidly constructed.

👂Hear this: If you’re a startup founder building in an environment where your product, your customer, and even your business model may change, your patent strategy has to reflect that reality.

🛑Otherwise, you may end up very well protected… but for the wrong product. Importantly, a broad patent that covers the wrong product is worthless to the startup because it protects something that no one likely wants to buy.

📽️In this new video in my Winning with Patents Youtube channel, I show startup founders how to shift how they think about patent strategy. Give it a watch: https://lnkd.in/dh88XMAu

#startups #patents #ipstrategy #patentstrategy #founders #innovation #winningwithpatents

#Startups #PatentStrategy #IntellectualProperty #Founders #StartupAdvice #VentureCapital #Innovation #TechStartups #ProductMarketFit #Entrepreneurship #IPStrategy #Patents #BusinessStrategy #AIStartups #meddevice

4 0

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLlRNZE1DazQ0cWZZ

Patenting Your Startup's Invention is Not a Winning Patent Strategy

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups April 17, 2026 2:37 pm

The Big Mistake Startup Founders Can Make on Day 1 — And How to Avoid It

🚨 The most dangerous startup mistake doesn’t start with bad technology or poorly crafted product development.

⚖️ It starts with unclear ownership for the startup's intellectual property. And, notwithstanding the problems it can make for startups, I see this time and time again.

❓How does the Startup IP Ownership Trap occur? It’s pretty easy to predict, actually.

🚀 At the beginning of a startup journey, founders like you move fast. You brainstorm. You whiteboard. You build. You collaborate. But in the typical situation, no one stops to define who actually owns the intellectual property being created. This is not surprising because who wants to stop and spend money on lawyers when you are sprinting toward delivering a really cool technology or product to people who will pay you?!

⚠️ That decision — or lack of decision — to address IP ownership at the initial stages of your startup journey can follow your company for years. In fact, the decisions you make — or actually don’t make — at the beginning can destroy your ability to attract investment or make it impossible for your startup to achieve a strong exit.

🔍 In this video, I break down:

• Why early-stage collaboration quietly creates ownership risk
• How patent law treats inventorship and co-ownership
• Why joint patent ownership can destroy exclusivity
• What investors look for during IP due diligence
• And the simple steps founders can take to avoid disaster

🧠 You do not need expensive legal perfection at the earliest stage.

✅ But you do need ownership clarity.

⏳ Because intellectual property rights are created the moment innovation is created — not when you incorporate, not when you file a patent, and not when you raise capital.

📈 If you’re building something that could scale, this is a conversation you need to have now — not later.

🛡️ Build fast. But build protected.

🎯 Subscribe to Winning With Patents for practical, founder-focused IP strategy that helps you build real enterprise value.

#StartupFounder
#Patents
#IntellectualProperty
#IPStrategy
#PatentStrategy
#Startups
#FounderMistakes
#DueDiligence
#WinningWithPatents

The Big Mistake Startup Founders Can Make on Day 1 — And How to Avoid It

🚨 The most dangerous startup mistake doesn’t start with bad technology or poorly crafted product development.

⚖️ It starts with unclear ownership for the startup's intellectual property. And, notwithstanding the problems it can make for startups, I see this time and time again.

❓How does the Startup IP Ownership Trap occur? It’s pretty easy to predict, actually.

🚀 At the beginning of a startup journey, founders like you move fast. You brainstorm. You whiteboard. You build. You collaborate. But in the typical situation, no one stops to define who actually owns the intellectual property being created. This is not surprising because who wants to stop and spend money on lawyers when you are sprinting toward delivering a really cool technology or product to people who will pay you?!

⚠️ That decision — or lack of decision — to address IP ownership at the initial stages of your startup journey can follow your company for years. In fact, the decisions you make — or actually don’t make — at the beginning can destroy your ability to attract investment or make it impossible for your startup to achieve a strong exit.

🔍 In this video, I break down:

• Why early-stage collaboration quietly creates ownership risk
• How patent law treats inventorship and co-ownership
• Why joint patent ownership can destroy exclusivity
• What investors look for during IP due diligence
• And the simple steps founders can take to avoid disaster

🧠 You do not need expensive legal perfection at the earliest stage.

✅ But you do need ownership clarity.

⏳ Because intellectual property rights are created the moment innovation is created — not when you incorporate, not when you file a patent, and not when you raise capital.

📈 If you’re building something that could scale, this is a conversation you need to have now — not later.

🛡️ Build fast. But build protected.

🎯 Subscribe to Winning With Patents for practical, founder-focused IP strategy that helps you build real enterprise value.

#StartupFounder
#Patents
#IntellectualProperty
#IPStrategy
#PatentStrategy
#Startups
#FounderMistakes
#DueDiligence
#WinningWithPatents

1 0

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLkY3NkVHZ1BUejVB

The Startup Collaboration IP Trap: The Mistake Founders Can Make on Day 1 and How to Avoid It

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups February 25, 2026 5:05 pm

Most Startup Founders assume that filing a patent means also giving away their “secret sauce.” The assumption that seeking patent protection requires losing your trade secret advantage in 18 months is wrong — and it can cost you leverage, optionality, and competitive advantage.

In this episode of Winning with Patents, Jackie Hutter explains how Startup Founders can secure early patent priority in the U.S. without exposing their technology to competitors. This is done using one of the most underutilized tools at the USPTO: Non-publication Requests. You’ll learn how to keep your patent application--and the trade secrets contained in it--confidential while it’s pending, and how secrecy can buy you critical time to validate your business model, raise capital, and refine your technology.

This video also walks you through how Non-publication of a U.S. patent application pairs with continuation-in-part (CIP) strategy to build a layered, evolving patent portfolio that grows alongside your company — and why treating patents as business assets (not legal checkboxes) can directly impact valuation, fundraising, and exit outcomes.

If you’re a founder who wants protection and leverage — without tipping your hand — this episode is for you.

Hashtags
#StartupIP #PatentStrategy #IntellectualProperty #StartupLaw  #VentureCapital #StartupFounders #StealthStartup  #TechStartups #IPStrategy #StartupGrowth #Entrepreneurship

Most Startup Founders assume that filing a patent means also giving away their “secret sauce.” The assumption that seeking patent protection requires losing your trade secret advantage in 18 months is wrong — and it can cost you leverage, optionality, and competitive advantage.

In this episode of Winning with Patents, Jackie Hutter explains how Startup Founders can secure early patent priority in the U.S. without exposing their technology to competitors. This is done using one of the most underutilized tools at the USPTO: Non-publication Requests. You’ll learn how to keep your patent application--and the trade secrets contained in it--confidential while it’s pending, and how secrecy can buy you critical time to validate your business model, raise capital, and refine your technology.

This video also walks you through how Non-publication of a U.S. patent application pairs with continuation-in-part (CIP) strategy to build a layered, evolving patent portfolio that grows alongside your company — and why treating patents as business assets (not legal checkboxes) can directly impact valuation, fundraising, and exit outcomes.

If you’re a founder who wants protection and leverage — without tipping your hand — this episode is for you.

Hashtags
#StartupIP #PatentStrategy #IntellectualProperty #StartupLaw #VentureCapital #StartupFounders #StealthStartup #TechStartups #IPStrategy #StartupGrowth #Entrepreneurship

0 0

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLjJQUk5hX0x4cFp3

Startup Founders: You Don't Have to Give Up Your Trade Secrets to Obtain Patent Protection

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups February 4, 2026 4:00 pm

😕For those who aren't experts, patents can seem not only expensive, but also arcane and obtuse. So, why spend the money if you can't understand what value you can get from them?  

💵In fact, patents rarely matter, but when they matter, they matter A LOT. For innovative companies that are investing in R&D to create real solutions for real customers, patents may be key creating a durable revenue stream by keeping competitors at bay. 

⁉️It takes more than getting a patent . . . your startup has to have the right patent strategy. But, what does this mean if you are not an expert? 

👁️No problem is ever new, it's just new to you. The answer is there for you if you look. 

🔎You can learn best practices in patent strategy from companies like Procter & Gamble that get patent strategy right--every single time. Companies that win with patents consistently link patents tightly to product launches, line extensions, and long-term revenue. This discipline is why innovation at scale can become predictable, repeatable business growth.

🎯In this video, I break down what great patent strategy for innovative companies looks like — and why the goal for startups isn’t just to get patents, but to build the right patents that support sustainable revenue from innovative products.

By watching, you will learn when patent strategy is done well, it:

✔️Protects the product features customers actually pay for
✔️Reinforces differentiation and market position
✔️Enables confident investment in R&D and product roadmaps
✔️Turns innovation into durable, defensible revenue streams

📖Showing how consumer products that you buy everyday are made more successful with good patent strategy isn’t legal theory. It’s practical, operator-level guidance for entrepreneurs, technical founders, CEOs, and executives who want their patents to do real work inside their businesses.

👉 The real question isn’t whether you have patents — it’s whether you’re building the right patents to turn innovation into lasting revenue. This video shows you how it's done. 

#PatentStrategy
#StartupPatents
#Patents
#IntellectualProperty
#InnovationStrategy
#Entrepreneurship
#winningwithpatents

😕For those who aren't experts, patents can seem not only expensive, but also arcane and obtuse. So, why spend the money if you can't understand what value you can get from them?

💵In fact, patents rarely matter, but when they matter, they matter A LOT. For innovative companies that are investing in R&D to create real solutions for real customers, patents may be key creating a durable revenue stream by keeping competitors at bay.

⁉️It takes more than getting a patent . . . your startup has to have the right patent strategy. But, what does this mean if you are not an expert?

👁️No problem is ever new, it's just new to you. The answer is there for you if you look.

🔎You can learn best practices in patent strategy from companies like Procter & Gamble that get patent strategy right--every single time. Companies that win with patents consistently link patents tightly to product launches, line extensions, and long-term revenue. This discipline is why innovation at scale can become predictable, repeatable business growth.

🎯In this video, I break down what great patent strategy for innovative companies looks like — and why the goal for startups isn’t just to get patents, but to build the right patents that support sustainable revenue from innovative products.

By watching, you will learn when patent strategy is done well, it:

✔️Protects the product features customers actually pay for
✔️Reinforces differentiation and market position
✔️Enables confident investment in R&D and product roadmaps
✔️Turns innovation into durable, defensible revenue streams

📖Showing how consumer products that you buy everyday are made more successful with good patent strategy isn’t legal theory. It’s practical, operator-level guidance for entrepreneurs, technical founders, CEOs, and executives who want their patents to do real work inside their businesses.

👉 The real question isn’t whether you have patents — it’s whether you’re building the right patents to turn innovation into lasting revenue. This video shows you how it's done.

#PatentStrategy
#StartupPatents
#Patents
#IntellectualProperty
#InnovationStrategy
#Entrepreneurship
#winningwithpatents

2 0

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLml6SFZVYldyejBJ

Example Great Patent Strategy 2026 1

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups January 15, 2026 6:08 pm

The answer is not a simple yes or no. It’s a strategy question. Would a patent allow you to do a better job delighting your customers and generating new and BETTER revenue streams?

Whether you get a patent or not needs to be very closely aligned with your business or your business has to define whether or not you need a patent. 

For large companies, this is a pretty easy thing to figure out. They get shelf space at Home Depot or Walmart just by asking. But for entrepreneurs and small companies, all of those things are not a given. 

A patent will likely end up being worthless unless and until you can demonstrate how you're going to make money from that idea. Having a patent that covers a successful business idea can be very useful, if not critical. A patent allows you to go to a large company that might want access to your business, your customers, and your revenue streams. If you have a patent on your product or idea that you have customers and revenue for that could very well define your exit plan. 

Having a patent can allow a potential acquirer to see that the revenue you have today is sustainable. Nobody wants to pay for a business based upon today's revenue if they can't show that or they can't be satisfied that that revenue is going to continue in the future. 

Another reason to get a patent is to develop strategic partnerships. Very often large companies do not enter into small markets because they're too busy in their existing markets or they don't even know that a market exists. Entrepreneurs create new markets and new opportunities but it’s hard to ask others to adopt and buy it without revenue and scalability. If you develop strategic partnerships with the incumbents who might want to have access to the technology,  they can try it before they buy it. Once your improvements are integrated inside of a large corporation's ecosystem, it's very difficult for them to back out of having your stuff in their product line. And if they do, you can take your patented product and go offer it to one of their competitors with a track record of success and data. A patent and a partnership can give you a competitive advantage in a market where you wouldn't necessarily be large enough to play.

Keep in mind that companies don't buy patents, they buy businesses. And if your business is protected by a patent, then that's going to make it more likely that your business is going to be bought. Patents are never a means to an end, but a way to enhance and surpass your business goals.

Please reach out and let me know how I can help you generate desired business outcomes using intellectual property.

https://thehuttergroup.com/

The answer is not a simple yes or no. It’s a strategy question. Would a patent allow you to do a better job delighting your customers and generating new and BETTER revenue streams?

Whether you get a patent or not needs to be very closely aligned with your business or your business has to define whether or not you need a patent.

For large companies, this is a pretty easy thing to figure out. They get shelf space at Home Depot or Walmart just by asking. But for entrepreneurs and small companies, all of those things are not a given.

A patent will likely end up being worthless unless and until you can demonstrate how you're going to make money from that idea. Having a patent that covers a successful business idea can be very useful, if not critical. A patent allows you to go to a large company that might want access to your business, your customers, and your revenue streams. If you have a patent on your product or idea that you have customers and revenue for that could very well define your exit plan.

Having a patent can allow a potential acquirer to see that the revenue you have today is sustainable. Nobody wants to pay for a business based upon today's revenue if they can't show that or they can't be satisfied that that revenue is going to continue in the future.

Another reason to get a patent is to develop strategic partnerships. Very often large companies do not enter into small markets because they're too busy in their existing markets or they don't even know that a market exists. Entrepreneurs create new markets and new opportunities but it’s hard to ask others to adopt and buy it without revenue and scalability. If you develop strategic partnerships with the incumbents who might want to have access to the technology, they can try it before they buy it. Once your improvements are integrated inside of a large corporation's ecosystem, it's very difficult for them to back out of having your stuff in their product line. And if they do, you can take your patented product and go offer it to one of their competitors with a track record of success and data. A patent and a partnership can give you a competitive advantage in a market where you wouldn't necessarily be large enough to play.

Keep in mind that companies don't buy patents, they buy businesses. And if your business is protected by a patent, then that's going to make it more likely that your business is going to be bought. Patents are never a means to an end, but a way to enhance and surpass your business goals.

Please reach out and let me know how I can help you generate desired business outcomes using intellectual property.

https://thehuttergroup.com/

2 1

YouTube Video VVVXVkdINEFjUXkxSFdLX21vZTd6UExRLnhhWGkyc3JtRFBF

Should I Get A Patent?

Winning with Patents: Expert Insights for Startups March 11, 2023 2:35 pm

The Podcast

Winning with Patents (and IP)

Two seasons, 2020 to 2021. The ideas behind the process, in conversation.

S2 · E1

Why Patents Fail Startups

S1 · E5

Designing Patent Applications for Allowance

S1 · E4

Why You Must Hold Yourself and Your IP Team Accountable

S1 · E3

What Should You Patent? An Introduction to Creating Innovation

S1 · E2

An Example of a Patent Win: P&G’s Successful Protection Strategy

S1 · E1

What Does It Mean to Win with Patents and IP?